图书馆员2.0自测
January 24, 2006
Stephen Abram, 我ä¸?太清楚有多少人了解æ¤å?›ï¼Œä»–也是图书馆界人士出身,现在是SirsiDynixå…¬å?¸çš„创新(Innovation)副总è£?。他在SirsiDynix的网站专æ ?ä¸è´´äº†ä¸€ç¯‡æœ‰å…³Library 2.0的评论。 虽然我个人ä¸?认为精彩之处甚多,但到底他现在是厂商人士,所以讨论的角度颇有æ„?味,大家有兴趣也å?¯ä»¥åŽ»çœ‹çœ‹ã€‚å°¤å…¶æ˜¯ä»–æ??出图书馆员2.0应该干什么或者å?¯ 以ç?†è§£ä¸ºèƒ½å¹²ä»€ä¹ˆï¼Œé¢‡æœ‰åˆ›æ„?,所以我这边ä¸?客气将它盗用一把,贴在这儿。并以æ¤ä½œä¸ºä¸€ä¸ªè¯„价表对自己的图书馆员2.0能力或者说æˆ?熟度进行一下测评。(说 明一下,原文照贴,在æ¤ä¸?作翻译了,我å?ªè´´ä¸Šæˆ‘自己的测评)
Librarian 2.0 Librarian 2.0 is the guru of the information age. Librarian 2.0 strives to
· Understand the power of the Web 2.0 opportunities(这一项我看æ?¥å?¯ä»¥å¾—分,对于Web 2.0所带æ?¥çš„é?©å‘½æ€§çš„æœºé?‡è¿˜æ˜¯æœ‰æ‰€è®¤è¯†ï¼Œä½†å¦‚果光说Library 2.0çš„è¯?,我就è¦?è¢«æ‰£åˆ†äº†ï¼Œå› ä¸ºæˆ‘ä¸?仅认识ä¸?足,还到处浇水。:-)
· Learn the major tools of Web 2.0 and Library 2.0 (Web 2.0有哪些主è¦?çš„Tool呢?我肯定ä¸?是沉迷于Web 2.0çš„geek, æ??怕ä¸?光是认识问题,在技能与å¦è¯†ä¸Šä¹Ÿè¦?扣上一点的。有关Library 2.0çš„Tools? 现在有å?—?我怎么一点都ä¸?知é?“啊?好了,所以这一æ?¡æˆ‘最起ç ?è¦?扣掉0.5分)
· Combine e-resources and print formats and is container and format agnostic (作为已ç»?有二å??年以上信æ?¯æŠ€æœ¯ç»?验的专业人士,对ä¸?å?Œçš„ä¿¡æ?¯èµ„æº?的认识与掌æ?¡ä¸ªäººè®¤ä¸ºè¿˜æ˜¯å‹‰å¼ºå?ˆæ ¼çš„,应该算得分å?§ã€‚)
· Is device independent and uses and delivers to everything from laptops to PDAs to iPods (别的还好说,iPods?什么东西?没用过啊。想想éš?ç?€ä¸?æ–年长的缘故,现在对家里的新设备都没有å°?儿敢动手啊。汗颜,扣0.5分å?§ã€‚)
· Develop targeted federated search and adopts the OpenURL standard (这个å?ªèƒ½è¯´ç?†è®ºæŽŒæ?¡ï¼Œæˆ‘们也在实践ä¸å°?试过如æ¤çš„工作,但ä¸?甚æˆ?功。所以扣上0.5分也是应该的å?§ã€‚)
· Connect people and technology and information in context (这个应该å?¯ä»¥å¾—分,å??调人与技术å?Šä¿¡æ?¯ä¹‹é—´çš„关系是我本è?Œå·¥ä½œä¸çš„é‡?点。)
· Doesn’t shy away from non-traditional cataloging and classification and chooses tagging, tag clouds, folksonomies, and user-driven content descriptions and classifications where appropriate (我ä¸?æ˜¯ä¼ ç»Ÿçš„ç¼–ç›®äººå‘˜ï¼Œè™½ç„¶æ›¾ç»?干过。所以我是å??å‡ å¹´å‰?å°±å¯¹è¿™æ ·çš„è½¬åž‹ä¸?shy了,所以å?¯ä»¥å¾—分å?§ã€‚)
· Embrace non-textual information and the power of pictures, moving images, sight, and sound (对这个有充分的认识,虽然ä¸?能说应用得é?žå¸¸å¥½ï¼Œå› 为这个需è¦?一定的艺术细胞å?Šä¸?å?Œçš„知识,但总算还是有相当的认识与åˆ?æ¥çš„æŠ€èƒ½å?§ã€‚勉强得分。)
· Understand the “long tail� and leverages the power of old and new content (这个是认识问题,对于长尾虽然也是�段时间刚认识到,但总算有认识�。�以得分。)
· See the potential in using content sources like the Open Content Alliance, Google Print, and Open WorldCat (嗯,这个很是认å?Œã€‚但ä¸?能说对这个新的项目与æœ?务其真æ£çš„æ½œåŠ›æœ‰å¤šå¤§çš„è®¤è¯†ï¼Œæ‰£ä¸Š0.5分å?§ã€‚)
· Connect users to expert discussions, conversations, and communities of practice and participates there as well ï¼ˆè™½ç„¶æœ‰è¿™æ ·çš„è®¤è¯†ï¼Œä½†æ˜¯åœ¨å®žè·µä¸æ˜Žæ˜¾å?šå¾—有相当的è·?离,最起ç ?是扣上0.5分。)
· Use the latest tools of communication (such as Skype) to connect content, expertise, information coaching, and people (这个有点讨厌了,是用过啊。但Skypeä¸?是现在被ç¦?了å?—ï¼Ÿå½“ç„¶è¿™å±žçŽ¯å¢ƒå› ç´ ï¼Œä¸?是我们的主观能动性问题,也算得分å?§ã€‚)
· Use and develops advanced social networks to enterprise advantage (如果è¦?ä»¥ä¼ ç»Ÿæ‰‹æ®µï¼Œå°±ä¸å›½äººå¯¹äººé™…关系的é‡?视与处ç?†èƒ½åŠ›æ˜Žæ˜¾æ˜¯……,但这里说的ä¸?是这回事å?§ï¼Ÿæ‰€ä»¥çœ‹æ?¥å?šå¾—ä¸?好,è¦?扣上0.5分。)
· Connect with everyone using their communication mode of choice – telephone, Skype, IM, SMS, texting, email, virtual reference, etc. (在我们的实践ä¸è¿™ä¸€ç‚¹æ˜¯å?šå¾—很努力的了,所以应该算是得分å?§ã€‚)
· Encourage user driven metadata and user developed content and commentary ï¼ˆæ ¹æœ¬æ²¡å?¯èƒ½ï¼Œæ‰£åˆ†ã€‚我们目å‰?æ²¡æœ‰è¿™æ ·çš„å®žè·µä¸Žæœ?务,并且主观能动性与环境å?Šå…¶ä»–å› ç´ çš„å†²çª?也太大了。)
· Understand the wisdom of crowds and the emerging roles and impacts of the blogosphere, Web syndicasphere and wikisphere (这个是有充分的认识,但也充分认识到wiki是被å°?äº†çš„è¿™ä¸€äº‹å®žï¼Œå› æ¤……,这个就ä¸?è¦?扣分了å?§ï¼Ÿå› ä¸ºæˆ‘ä»¬ä¹Ÿå¾ˆæ— å¥ˆå•Šã€‚ï¼‰
综�上�的评测,�设图书馆员2.0以20分计的�,以上是16项(�足20的部分就算我的基本分�。:-),我们�看看扣了多少分, 嗯,一共扣了4分。则�以算得16分�,�对�是扣除这个4分的基本分,是�我�有12分而已?所以综�评价,我�能算是图书馆员1.5�。
回过头æ?¥æƒ³ï¼Œä»¥æˆ‘们馆的情况,能有多少人能算图书馆员2.0呢?å?ˆæœ‰å¤šå°‘人能算1.5呢?多少人……ä¸?敢往下想了。就我们馆æ?¥ 说,æ£å¼?å‘˜å·¥ä¸æ??怕最起ç ?有三分之一以上的员工对最基本的信æ?¯æŠ€æœ¯å·¥å…·çš„电脑的æ“?作都ä¸?能算熟练å?§ï¼Ÿåœ¨è¿™æ ·çš„æƒ…况下,我们的图书馆2.0建设是å?¦ä¹Ÿè¦?ç‰ åˆ°……
下å?ˆå¼€é¦†é‡Œçš„è?Œå·¥å¤§ä¼šï¼Œä¼šè®®ç»“æ?Ÿå?Žç«Ÿç„¶å”±èµ·äº†é‚£é¦–ä¹…è¿?çš„æŒï¼šâ€œè‹±ç‰¹çº³é›„è€?尔,就一定è¦?实现……â€?
Entry Filed under: �专业. .
2 Comments Add your own
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed
1. Keven | January 27, 2006 at 2:47 am
一点感想
å?šä»€ä¹ˆï¼Ÿä¸ºä»€ä¹ˆè¦?å?šï¼Ÿå¯¹è±¡æ˜¯è°??什么目的?能ä¸?能达到目的?达ä¸?到目的å?ˆå¦‚何(风险管ç?†ï¼‰ï¼Ÿå?šåˆ°ä»€ä¹ˆæ·±åº¦ï¼Ÿå¦‚何å?šï¼ˆè§’色与æµ?程ã€?激励机制)?如何å?¯æŒ?ç»ï¼Ÿä¸ŽçŽ¯å¢ƒçš„å…³è?”(资æº?与æœ?务…
2.
Leon | January 27, 2006 at 3:28 am
Keven就是拽,写那么多。5W1Hä¸?就得了?明天å?¶é€šçŸ¥é¢†å¯¼ä»¬æŽ’排å??,å?¬keven上课。